Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Aerosols in U.S. Residences: Sample analysis Using Two Detection Criteria

Uniform practices and quality control methods are needed to detect and quantify airborne viruses across sampling and analysis platforms. We compared detection of airborne SARSCoV-2 RNA in residences of individuals with COVID-19 using two commonly used criteria: environmental (at least one SARS-CoV-2-specific gene and internal control amplified by PCR with Ct ≤ 40) and clinical (at least two SARS-CoV-2-specific genes and internal control amplified with Ct ≤ 37). 24-hr total aerosol samples were collected in a self-isolation room and an additional room without manipulating subjects' behavior/activities. Under the environmental criterion, 7/16 samples in primary rooms and 7/15 samples in secondary rooms were positive. Comparable but lower positive sample proportions were observed using the more rigorous clinical criterion: 6/16 primary rooms and 5/15 secondary rooms. A consensus SARS-CoV-2 environmental sampling and analysis framework is needed for comparisons between studies. © 2022 17th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, INDOOR AIR 2022. All rights reserved.

Comparing the quantitative fit-testing results of half-mask respirators with various skin barriers in a crossover study design: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians around the world are experiencing skin breakdown due to the prolonged usage of masks while working long hours to treat patients with COVID-19. The skin damage is a result of the increased friction and pressure at the mask-skin barrier. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians have been applying various skin barriers to prevent and ameliorate skin breakdown. However, there are no studies to our knowledge that assess the safety and efficacy of using these skin barriers without compromising a sufficient mask-face seal. AIM: To conduct the largest study to date of various skin barriers and seal integrity with quantitative fit testing (QNFT). METHODS: This pilot study explored whether the placement of a silicone scar sheet (ScarAway®), Cavilon™, or Tegaderm™ affects 3M™ half-face mask respirator barrier integrity when compared to no barrier using QNFT. Data were collected from nine clinicians at an academic level 1 trauma centre in New Jersey. FINDINGS: The silicone scar sheet resulted in the lowest adequate fit, whereas Cavilon provided the highest fit factor when compared to other interventions (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings help inform clinicians considering barriers for comfort when wearing facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic and for future pandemics.